Let’s dismantle the myth of climate change
The European Union allocates roughly 30% of its multiannual budget to climate action, amounting to about €658 billion for the 2021–2027 period.
In addition, the EU and its member states provide substantial annual public and private funding to support developing countries in shifting to low-carbon economies and adapting to global warming.
And this is only Europe. So where does all this money go?
For comparison, The European Union invests billions of euros into infrastructure annually, allocating approximately €42.1 billion per year specifically for cohesion and regional development that supports green infrastructure.
Questions About the Spending
These figures raise several important questions. What drives spending on this scale, and how is it justified to taxpayers?
They also invite a broader debate about political priorities, public accountability, and whether such funding is being used effectively and transparently.
Natural Climate Variability
Earth’s climate has never been static. Over long periods of time, it has shifted in response to a range of natural processes that operated long before human societies emerged.
These processes include glacial and interglacial cycles linked to Milankovitch orbital patterns, changes in solar activity such as sunspot cycles and longer-term fluctuations, large-scale ocean circulation patterns like the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), volcanic activity, and feedback within the biosphere. Evidence from ice cores, sediment records, and tree rings shows that climate variability has been a persistent feature of Earth’s history.
The world population has grown by roughly 6 billion people over the last 100 years. It surged from about 2 billion in 1927 to over 8 billion in recent years. This means the global human population has quadrupled in just a century due to advances in public health and agriculture.
Population Growth and Urban Concentration
These trends also raise broader questions about population growth and settlement patterns. Rather than focusing only on the increase in the global population, it may be worth asking whether vulnerability is also linked to the concentration of people in large urban areas.
From personal experience in the 1960s, I can say that severe weather was already a reality long before today’s climate debate. As a sailor on Pacific routes, I encountered typhoons and hurricanes that, in my view, were at least as intense as many of the events now described as “extreme weather.”
This perspective also suggests a broader point: in earlier periods, populations were often more geographically dispersed. Because of that, the effects of severe weather may have been experienced differently, even when climate variability itself was substantial.
Solar Activity, Magnetic Shifts, and Weather Patterns
One argument is that weather patterns are influenced not only by human activity but also by natural forces such as solar variability. From this perspective, the sun plays a central role in sustaining life on Earth, and its recurring cycles, including the roughly 11-year solar cycle and periods of increased solar storm activity, are seen as factors that may affect Earth’s magnetic field and, in turn, atmospheric circulation which affects weather conditions.
A related point concerns the movement of the magnetic North Pole. Over the past century, it has shifted significantly, moving slowly for much of the twentieth century before accelerating from Canada toward Siberia. Supporters of this view argue that such changes may have broader implications for geophysical and climatic systems.
They also suggest that changes in magnetic conditions could influence ocean circulation patterns, including systems such as the Gulf Stream and El Niño, with possible effects on regional weather. In this interpretation, such processes are not new but part of recurring natural variations that have occurred many times in Earth’s history.
Final Assessment
From this perspective, humanity cannot prevent all changes in weather conditions. What it can do, however, is respond more wisely by recognizing environmental risks and adapting to them.
That includes planning settlements more carefully in vulnerable areas such as coastlines and major river zones and strengthening public awareness through education from an early age. In this view, the priority is not protest against forces beyond human control, but practical adaptation to the reality we face.
Thanks for reading my post,
#Windmush / #Curtbergsten
